Refresh Checked Unchecked Menu Search Shopping bag Geolocation Person Facebook Instagram Twitter YouTube Info Icon CBC Icon CBC Shape CBD Icon CBD Shape CBG Icon CBG Shape THC Icon THC Shape THCV Icon THCV Shape
Advertise on Leafly

Quebec Wants to Ban Homegrow. Is It the Will of the Voters or Vested Interests?

May 15, 2018
(Nastasic/iStock)
The government of Quebec is forging ahead in its showdown with Ottawa over homegrown cannabis. On May 9, Quebec’s Liberal house leader and Minister Responsible for Canadian Relations Jean-Marc Fournier published an op-ed in the Montreal Gazette railing against the federal government’s refusal to allow Quebec to ban cannabis home-growing.

Ottawa wants to do things one way, Quebec wants to chart its own course, and the provincial and federal government will no doubt invest a wealth of taxpayer dollars in figuring out who’s in the legal right.

“The Canadian minister of Justice is mistaken in her claim that, under the Canadian federal regime, the federal Parliament, acting alone, can create a ‘national regime for the legalization of cannabis,’” Fournier wrote. “By seeking to undermine Quebec’s choice on the issue of home-grown cannabis, the federal government shows how little consideration and recognition it grants to the wishes of a provincial partner, a partner essential to the fulfilment of its election promise, and one who has shown its collaboration in the management of an issue that arose solely from a federal government intention.”

This conflict has all the appearances of a classic battle between Quebec and Ottawa, the kind Canadians have seen many times before. Ottawa wants to do things one way, Quebec wants to chart its own course, and the provincial and federal government will no doubt invest tens or hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars in figuring out who is ultimately in the legal right.

The only missing piece is the Quebec public. Unlike in other Quebec/Ottawa showdowns, this time around a significant proportion of Quebeckers don’t support their government’s position.

Who’s Driving the Protest Against Home Grow?

Five days prior to Fournier’s op-ed, TVA revealed that an overwhelming majority—84.2%—of Quebeckers who participated in last year’s provincial public consultations on cannabis want to be allowed to grow cannabis at home. Quebec residents who completed questionnaires online, meanwhile, voted 60.8% for allowing home cultivation, and 35.4% against.

Unlike in other Quebec/Ottawa showdowns, this time around an overwhelming majority of Quebeckers don’t support their government’s position.

The Ministry of Health and Social Services document containing this information, “L’encadrement du cannabis au Québec – Rapport des consultations publiques,” has been online since November 13, 2017. Six days after it was published, Public Health Minister Lucie Charlebois told the audience of popular talk-show Tout Le Monde en Parle, “the population demanded […] what they told us is, ‘No, what we prefer is for you to start out in a more rigorous manner and oversee it more severely.”

She then offered what has since become a famous explanation for banning home growing, explaining that she lives in the country and has eight grandchildren who visit on the weekend. “If the oldest, who’s six, goes over to the neighbours’ side, and inadvertently gets into it and consumes a bit [of cannabis],” she explained, “maybe eating it[…] It’s not good to have near a house where there are children, near a park.” She added that she learned during the consultation that “four good pot plants, with two people at home, that will get two people stoned 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. And you know what? There’ll be some left over.”

Related

Quebec Battles Federal Law and Facts En Route to Legalization

Charlebois repeated her opposition to home-growing in December 4 interview with Vice, saying “The population asked us to be cautious and that’s what we’re doing. We must not normalize cannabis culture. Teenagers will find themselves in houses where people grow cannabis. The application of the federal law is not evident. Quebec municipalities have told us they don’t have the means to apply the federal law on home-growing.”

On February 8, she said again, “What I’ll tell you is the majority of people, what they ask me for, is zero plants in the home.”

The Public Health Minister’s documents show a large majority of individuals are in favour of home growing. The one majority of respondents opposed to home cultivation: organizations.

After TVA revealed last week that the Minister’s own numbers show a large majority of those who participated in the public consultations she organized are in favour of home growing, Charlebois responded simply, “If you knew the number of people who telephoned me […] who telephoned my riding office, and who wrote to me to tell me I’d made the right decision.”

The Silent Majority

There was one majority of respondents who were opposed to home cultivation: organizations. The public consultation invited both individuals and representatives of a variety of bodies from across Quebec to have their say about how they wanted to see legalization occur. Of the organizations who submitted briefs, 68.2% were opposed to home cannabis cultivation.

“When you consider that 84% of Quebeckers were in favour—it’s ridiculous,” says Montreal Compassion Club founder Marc-Boris St-Maurice. “The Quebec government is looking for whatever justification for a home-growing ban they can find, and if they can find organizations against it, they’re more than happy to call on those.”

TVA described the organizations represented in the public consultations as “cities and landlords,” but in fact there were an enormous variety of groups who submitted briefs to the consultation—and cities and landlords were among those least represented.

“L’encadrement du cannabis au Québec – Rapport des consultations publiques” lists the 127 organizations who submitted briefs during the regional events of the public consultation. Classified by category, they reveal a list of groups headed by for-profit cannabis producers and dispensaries (16%), health and social-service organizations (15%), substance-abuse organizations (12%), and business associations (9%).

Contrary to media insistence that organizational opposition to home growing was led by landlords, the three  landlords’ associations only constituted 2% of the total organizational respondents (matched by 3 gardening/farming companies).

Related

Can Landlords Ban Legal Cannabis? Here’s What the Law Says

Only four oranizations could be loosely grouped together under the header of socio-medical cannabis-advocacy bodies—Accès national au cannabis medical, CACTUS, Centre Compassion de Montréal, and Coopérative de Solidarité Cann-Amis, comprising 3% of the organizational total. They were joined by six businesses (5%) that sold cannabis-related products and services but did not aspire to sell cannabis itself. These are most likely groups that supported home-growing but would neither profit nor lose profit as a result of it.

Health and Social Service organizations (15%), substance-abuse bodies (12%), mental health groups (6%), and schools (6%) may well have opposed home growing out of concern for those whom cannabis presents a potential for harm (principally children, those suffering mental illness, and those confronting substance abuse). If indeed they did, whether or not one agrees with that position, the public can take comfort that these organizations’ opposition to home growing was determined by consideration of what they believe would best serve the public good.

Related

Cannabis in a Distinct Society: Quebec’s Idiosyncratic Grapple With Legalization

The 21 for-profit cannabis producers and dispensaries—including leading national producers Aurora, Hydropothecary, and Canopy Growth (through its subsidiary Vert Cannabis)—represented a plurality of respondents. They were joined by 11 business organizations (9%), including the Canadian Federation for Enterprise, the Federation of Canadian Independent Businesses, the Federation of Quebec Chambers of Commerce, and the Union of Agricultural Producers.

Together, business federations and for-profit producers/dispensaries represented a full 25% of the organizations submitting briefs to the public consultation. This bloc of organizations has a variety of overlapping vested interests that would benefit from keeping home cultivation illegal.

When Charlebois speaks of a majority who oppose home growing, it very well may be a deck stacked with companies who stand to make a profit from keeping Quebeckers from growing their own.

Interestingly, the “Rapport des consultations publiques” only breaks down organizations into categories in considering the responses to whether Quebec should allow private retailers to sell cannabis versus retain a state monopoly as the province has on liquor. In that case, 71.4% of “Organizations associated with the cannabis industry or [otherwise] for-profit” wanted private cannabis retail, versus 60.2% of citizens, 86.7% of “Health, Social Services, Education, and Security” bodies, and 100% of “Other organizations” who wanted cannabis to remain sold through state bodies. The document does not show the individual percentages of opposition to home growing from cannabis-industry and for-profit organizations as distinct from health and social services bodies.

Marc-Boris St-Maurice condemns what he calls “the corporatization of cannabis in Canada,” noting that while the underground economy has been painted as being run by bad people, everyone he has encountered in the cannabis black market respects one another, gets along, and is happy to coexist.

“But corporate bigwigs, they want to squeeze out the little guy, cut out the middleman, shave a few dollars off here and there,” he says. “Their mentality is that competition is a foe to be eliminated. That is so not what pot is all about.”

“If you make beer at home, you don’t suddenly stop buying beer.”
Marc-Boris St-Maurice

He suspects that corporate cannabis producers opposing home-cultivation as a threat to their profit margin are ultimately shooting themselves in the foot by making enemies of consumers.

“Even if people do grow three or four plants at home, a lot of people don’t really know what they’re doing,” says St-Maurice. “It’s like if you make beer at home, you don’t suddenly stop buying beer. You make small batches for yourself but you end up still purchasing it. Companies that feel it’s a threat, well—are they interested in what’s good for marijuana consumers, or just in protecting their bottom line? People are eventually going to need to buy clones and other source materials. There could be a market for that.”

It isn’t clear what each organization supported in the brief it submitted. But the motivations of those submitting briefs were not all aligned. When Lucie Charlebois speaks of a majority who opposed home growing, she very well mean a majority of a group of organizations stacked with companies who stand to make a profit from keeping Quebeckers from growing their own, whose interest is financial, rather than public.

Related

Quebec Police Continue Zero-Tolerance Policy for Medical Dispensaries

Jean-Marc Fournier acknowledged outrage on seeing the public opinion passed over in favour of that of organizations when he wrote, “One could certainly restate the arguments underpinning Quebec’s decisions concerning the regulation of cannabis.” For him, it appears this isn’t about the question of cannabis at all, but rather the matter of keeping Ottawa out of Quebec’s legal jurisdiction. But for the rest of Quebeckers, it is strange to see Mr. Fournier fighting so valiantly to protect the right of the Quebec government to contradict the wishes of a clear majority of its citizens.

Jesse B. Staniforth's Bio Image

Jesse B. Staniforth

Jesse B. Staniforth is the editor of the free cannabis-industry
newsletter WeedWeek Canada. He also reports on Indigenous issues,
cybersecurity, and food safety.

View Jesse B. Staniforth's articles

  • jerryg

    A well-written piece. Thank you Jessie Staniforth. Lots of research here. I appreciate you digging deep enough to pretty much prove that, whatever the reason, it is not the will of the citizens of Quebec to ban home growing. Therefore this is a government sponsored idea, and the real question we must ask is why are they so adamant about not allowing this when clearly banning home growing will only be good for the government coffers, and of course the black market.

  • Natacha Lalande

    Well written, I’m a medical cannabis patient from Quebec and i will get my license to grow my own medicine.. but sadly for those who don’t have any illness or issue that can be helped with cannabis medically, they will be stuck waiting for the law to change or grow illegally, same for Manitobans who are in the same boat as us regarding growing cannabis plants

  • Natacha Lalande

    what disgusts me is that as a teen, my parents used make wine and beer at home, i didnt drink the beer because it was disgusting but i have a garden, i grow flowers, fine herbs and it’s fine, but don’t i dare grow cannabis tho… at same time, the government wants to keep the packages super plain and ugly not to be appealing to kids but ou just have to look at Smirnoff ad with the red white blue can and a Popsicle with the same colors just beside… Alcohol kill millions of people around the world every year, including alcohol poisoning (overdose) which you can die of… Cannabis on the other side, has never killed anyone who had a weed overdose, you can sleep it off and won’t kill you as you need to smoke 1500 LBS within 15 minutes to be lethal.

  • Wizard6x9

    We are becoming a Policed State, under the guise of cannabis legalization, this is not for the betterment of citizens but to increase the criminalization of all citizens to effectively control it’s citizens. Our federal government has NEVER sworn allegiance to either Canada, it’s Citizens or our Constitution. Our Federal Government are legally tide to the British Crown, and to further the influences of International Law; to circumvent Constitutional Law and the rights afforded to by our Constitution. This Bill tabled, will demand that police have the right to pull ANYONE over and demand a DNA test, they will test for all drugs something that would have required either an arrest or a warrant by the court. The government proposed a bill that circumvents judicial protocol. Mandatory roadside demand of our DNA (blood, saliva or maybe both) even without probable cause and no warrant (to ultimately be registered in a database?). Plus required registration of homegrown with municipalities/townships which means random warrantless entries into our homes and gardens by enforcement squads.

  • CharleeR

    Quebec’s desire to ban home growing when the Feds are legalizing federally and allowing growing, will make for plenty of court challenges and the growers will win. Fed law trumps provincial law = fed law wins. So, Quebecer’s; go ahead and grow anyway, as you will win in court, if necessary. Quebec is clearly not listening to ‘the people’, but only protecting financial interests of large companies for profit instead.

    • Jim B

      Well said. The only thing more difficult to regulate than allowing home grown cannabis is not approving home grown cannabis. Clearly, a faction of the population has been ‘harmed’ by your country’s prohibition…so a modicum of compassion might seem in order!(?)

  • Highway 69

    “Public Health Minister Lucie Charlebois…then offered what has since become a famous explanation for banning home growing: explaining that she lives in the country and has eight grandchildren who visit on the weekend. “If the oldest, who’s six, goes over to the neighbours’ side, and inadvertently gets into it and consumes a bit [of cannabis],” she explained, “maybe eating it[…] It’s not good to have near a house where there are children, near a park.”

    That’s ridiculous! I couldn’t imagine my 6 y.o grandkid deciding to pick my cannabis buds and eating them! Why would they choose them over my equally attractive/delicious Marigolds, peonies, lilies, irises, Sweet Williams, roses, etc.?

    What kid is going to say, “I want to see what that flower tastes like?”

    • Barry Allan

      A well known fact : Marijuana must be decarboxylated in order for it to have any THC effect when eaten ingested … 😀 … Weed laying around waiting to be smoked is NOT dangerous if ingested orally !!!

      • Jim B

        Wow, sho’nuff. Might give them a stomach ache. lol It IS a “well known fact” and thats a true fact!

  • Barry Allan

    What a BIG pile of Bull Poo … Well at least you’ll still have all that really CHEAP beer in Quebec 🍻

  • Barry Allan

    I wonder if you are aloud to grow tobacco in this State of Quebec 🤔 ??

  • MV 1967

    All people should be able to grow whatever plant they want.

  • Bob Carter

    The ignorance of people, You can eat a whole F&N Plant, and you can not get high, THC-V is not a intoxicant, it has to be heated to over 200 Degrees F, for the molecule to convert to THC the Psychoactive Molecule, Eating fresh cannabis plant matter is like eating a healthy (Hemp) salad, why do they allow people that are so stupid to lie and misinform the Canadian Public.

  • Jim B

    I feel so much better by reading the last line of this editorial. It seems the lawmakers are ignoring a large faction of Quesbec’s population. THIS MUST STOP! You go Jesse. We don’t allow it here in Alabama no way! Then again, that might not be completely accurate. Pretty sure the only way we see any cannabis is on the websites of other states dispensaries. Its all relative and we are relatively stupid AND lacking of any vision. LET THEM GROW! please. Better, JB